Pro and Con 550

Posted 7-9-00

Incoming email

Re: Double Anchor Moon
All the talk on this site about double anchors has to date given us the sign on the sun, the stars and now the moon. Last night,as I laid down to sleep the moon was setting in the west. At first I watched the half moon with casual interest. However, as it plunged further on the horizon the shadows in the craters grew deeper. I saw the appearance of the same double anchor image that appears on your main page. Even the color orange was apparent. Oh how mighty is our God! Blew me away! Shalom

My reply

Thanks. I wish I had watched the Moon as it set. Agape

Incoming email

Re: global governance
http://www.rense.com
Timeline To Global Governance, By Doug Lunney, Winnipeg Sun,
7-4-00: http://www.canoe.com/CNEWSTopNews/crop_jul4.html

My reply

> > 1945 Yalta Conference - (February) reached agreement on U.N. draft recommendations and set the date for U.N. conference. Germany surrenders (May 7). U.N. Charter - signed June 26, in San Francisco.

Thanks. The date the UN charter was signed was June 26, the same as the UR charter signed June 26, 2000. That just jumped out at me. Agape

Incoming email

Coming out of the Catholic church, I am finding great gaping holes in my understanding. We checked out denominations for years and now possess a "Berean" attitude before we accept anything. Since fall of last year, we are now in a fundamental Bible church which teaches a single (pre-millenial, pre-trib) rapture. Several concerns:
-how to deal with "one rapture" vs. "two raptures"-why is "two" not widely taught or accepted, even among fundamentalists, who say that if you miss the (1st) rapture, you are not saved and will probably not accept Christ during the Trib. (I think that their position has to do with God dealing mainly with Jews during the Trib and the verses suggesting that "strong delusion" will come upon those who have heard the Gospel prior to rapture but had failed to accept Christ.) I use J. Vernon McGee and John McArthur mainly for Bible study, and they, along (Stanley, Evans, Rogers), seem to only teach one pre-trib rapture. Are you just using different language: 2nd rapture=2nd Coming?

-there is great admonishment for "date setting"; are we sinning by studying these calculations? I know that we are to watch and that God is showing signs, BUT are we overstepping and getting sidetracked when we go into the potential details? -can you recommend a website or book that will help reconcile Jewish months/feasts/traditions with our calendar/NT etc.; we get lost really fast when the Jewish names and months are listed. -thank you for listing URLs; it helps gain some credibility when we try to share these news items with others (even Christians) who think we are losing our minds. Our great sadness is that none of our families are saved-all good works-churched but not born again. Telling them about these things only seems to drive them farther away. Yet, time seems so urgent...any suggestions?

My reply

> > we...now possess a "Berean" attitude before we accept anything

Praise the Lord. That is the only safe attitude to have. Everything should be compared with Scripture. All of us are human, capable of error, religious leaders and people alike. The only rock hard truth we have is the Bible. It must be our guide, or we are in danger of being "tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine" (Eph. 4:14). We should read the Bible ourselves. Then we have the background to be able to recognize whether what someone says is truth or not.

> > how to deal with "one rapture" vs. "two raptures"-why is "two" not widely taught

Pastors can't teach what they have not yet recognized. Please don't hold it against them. Most are doing the very best they know how to do. They are doing yoeman duty to bring people to Christ and show them how to walk the Christian walk. It consumes all their time and energy. That is their calling.

I don't know of a Seminary that teaches two Raptures, and people tend to believe as their teachers do. Surprisingly, not all Seminaries even even teach one Rapture. I had to figure out that there are two by studying Scripture myself, and that was not because I didn't have access to good teaching, because I did. It is just that there is more in Scripture than is widely understood, and no one understands everything that is there. I have come to the conclusion that there is more packed into that one small book than one person can dig out in a lifetime. There is always something else to learn.

> > fundamentalists, who say that if you miss the (1st) rapture, you are not saved

I have run into those that say the Laodiceans are not believers too. However, Jesus said, "What thou seest, write in a book, and send it unto the seven CHURCHES which are in Asia; unto Ephesus, and unto Smyrna, and unto Pergamos, and unto Thyatira, and unto Sardis, and unto Philadelphia, AND UNTO LAODICEA." In Rev. 3:16, he said, "because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth." I don't see how they could be spued out of the Body of Christ if they were not in Christ in the first place.

Others say that the foolish virgins are not believers. However, they have lamps, go out to meet the Bridegroom, and call Him Lord. To me, they are believers, and believers can be left behind. Lu. 12:46 says of the unwise steward, "The lord of that servant will come in a day when he looketh not for him, and at an hour when he is not aware, and will cut him in sunder (lit., cut him off), and will appoint him his portion (I think 2300 days, Dan. 8:14) with the UNBELIEVERS." If he is to be appointed a time with unbelievers, surely he is not himself an unbeliever too. Mt. 24:51 adds, "And shall cut him asunder, and appoint him his portion with the hypocrites (pretenders): there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth." Therefore, he is not an unbeliever or a pretender. What is left? that he is a believer.

We see "a man which had not on a wedding garment" cast outside the door at the wedding feast and are told, "there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth." Why? "For many are called, but few are chosen" (Mt. 22:11-14). Rev. 17:14 says, "they that ARE with him (the King of kings and Lord of lords) are called, and chosen, and faithful."

The prize Paul was running the race to win was to be part of the group called up at the first Rapture. He did not want to be a "castaway" at that time (I Cor. 9:24-27). In Phil. 3:14, he said, "I press toward the mark for the prize of the HIGH CALLING of God in Christ Jesus." He was in Christ, and didn't want to be spued out of His mouth.

Believers of this dispensation are promised Heaven. If they are left behind the first time, there must be another Rapture later on. No believer can be lost. Jn. 18:9 says, "That the saying might be fulfilled, which he spake, Of them which thou gavest me have I lost none." In I Cor. 3:10-15, Paul said, "other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ. Now if any man build upon this foundation gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, stubble; Every man's work shall be made manifest: for the day shall declare it, because it shall be revealed by fire; and the fire shall try every man's work of what sort it is. If any man's work abide which he hath built thereupon, he shall receive a reward. If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire."

> > Are you just using different language: 2nd rapture=2nd Coming?

No. I think the 2nd Rapture will be 7 Jewish months (Eze. 39:12) before the 2nd Coming. The saints all have to be in Heaven with Christ to be able to come back with him. Zech. 14:5 says, "the LORD my God shall come, and ALL THE SAINTS WITH THEE." The second gathering can be seen in Mk. 13:27: "And then shall he send his angels, and shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from the uttermost part of the earth (the Tribulation saints) to the uttermost part of heaven (those caught up in the first Rapture). All saints are called to the assembly on that day for the Judgment Seat of Christ.

Believers receive their rewards in Heaven while unbelievers on Earth get their just rewards for their unbelief. Rev. 11:18 says, "And the nations were angry (Israel is being attacked by the army led by Gog, Eze. 38), and thy wrath is come, and the time of the dead, that they should be judged, and that thou shouldest give reward unto thy servants the prophets, and to the saints, and them that fear thy name, small and great; and shouldest destroy them which destroy the earth."

> > there is great admonishment for "date setting"; are we sinning by studying these calculations?

I don't see how we could be. In Rev. 3:3, Jesus said, "Remember therefore how thou hast received and heard, and hold fast, and repent. If therefore thou shalt not watch, I will come on thee as a thief, and thou shalt not know what hour I will come upon thee." If we do watch, what can we know? In Mk. 13:23, he said, "But take ye heed: behold, I have foretold you all things." Lu. 8:17 says, "For nothing is secret, that shall not be made manifest; neither any thing hid, that shall not be known and come abroad."

For the correlation between calendars, try:
http://www.ibc.wustl.edu/~zuker/hebdate/

The feasts are Passover (Nisan 14), Unleavened Bread (7-day feast starting on Nisan 15), Firstfruits (Nisan 16), Pentecost (Sivan 6 or 7), Trumpets (Tishri 1), Day of Atonement (Tishri 10), and Tabernacles (7-day feast starting on Tishri 15, with an 8th day added). See Lev. 23.

> > Telling them about these things only seems to drive them farther away. Yet, time seems so urgent...any suggestions?

Only the Lord knows who is a true believer and who is not. Ask if they have accepted Christ as their own personal Saviour. Some don't realize that just going to church is not a guarantee. They should exercise their will and make a conscious decision to be certain. Pray for them. The Lord knows what they need more than we do. Ask him to put it in your head what you should say. Concentrate on the important thing, making sure that they have accepted Christ as their own personal Saviour, but if the conversation goes elsewhere, follow the Lord's leading. He knows what they are ready to assimilate. Agape

Her reply

Thank you for all the effort you invested in responding to my questions. You are both encouraging and challenging; I have alot to learn. I believe that you are providing a great service to countless believers by providing a forum for dialogue on these critical issues.

My reply

I appreciate your letting me help. I know, as you do, how it can be for your family and friends, someone who has trusted church membership and infant baptism to get them to Heaven. If they are never told that it would be best to pray and ask Jesus to be their own personal Saviour, how can they do it?

I know a girl, raised a Catholic, who said she went in to her brother's baptism in another church not understanding, and walked out understanding. That was the turning place in her life, and she was just the 2nd one in that large family to finally get to that place. They all did, one by one, in answer to her brother's prayers after he accepted Christ as his own personal Saviour.

He was going blind and lived with another boy who was born blind. Someone came to talk to the blind one about Christ, and her brother overheard and asked Christ to be his Saviour. From that time, one by one, they all came to realize that each person must make a definite decision and declare it to be born again. Rom. 10:9,10 says, "That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation."

Incoming email

Re: The Rapture
...For some reason tonight i happened to be on the net, and I typed in "The Rapture" and came across your webb site. To cut a long story short, I grew up in a Religious cult till I was 19 and then left home and the church i grew up in, and moved into a free pentecostal church. I have been in absolutley everything that I could be involved in with church from, childrens missions overseas to worship leading in church, and praying for peoples salvation to sharing my own testimony of how God helped me through my legalistic past. My passion has been always for church, until just recently when 2 years ago my exwife and I divorced. It was during this time that the music ministry I was involved with in the church we were going to, came to an abrupt end, also ending my keyboard worship playing and Music writing. etc.

To cut a long story short I have since met a Russian lady, and we have just got married together, but there is this burning desire to be back in church again and being part of the worship team. I have been playing Christian music tapes and I have been praying that God will come into our lives more and more. I think often about my daughter, and I pray often that God will keep her in his love. I guess what I really want to say is that after reading the Rapture information, I really wanted to be part of that and really know that when it happens that God would take me and my family too, but I felt really sad and unhappy, after reading it. I quietly in my heart prayed that prayer you had written, and felt a burdon go, but like Peter in the Boat, I started to look at the situation I was in and see where I had been, and began to feel unworthy and afraid. So where do I go from here.

How do I get my victory and confidence back from where I am.? I hope you can help.

My reply

Remember that a Christian lives for the future, not the past. We can't reroll that. However, we can get a fresh start. When man accepted Christ, Peter said, "he was purged from his old sins" (II Pet. 1:9). Every sin committed up to that time is gone, washed away. We start off Christian life pure in God's eyes. That is our first fresh start. I know you are past this, but I just want to emphasize the fresh start to build on.

After that, when we slip and sin, we should immediately confess it so the Lord can cleanse us of all unrighteousness. I Jn. 1:9 says, "If we confess our sins (known sins), he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness" (known and unknown). At that point, that stumble is past history, and we get another fresh start. The sin barrier between us and our holy God is broken down. We are back in fellowship. The Holy Spirit wells up within us like a fountain of living water. From that point, don't look back. Don't doubt what Scripture tells you plainly. If it says something plainly, believe it. Trust the Lord to keep his word.

You mentioned Peter. In Mt. 14:29-31, Jesus said, Come. And when Peter was come down out of the ship, he walked on the water, to go to Jesus. But when he saw the wind boisterous, he was afraid; and beginning to sink, he cried, saying, Lord, save me. And immediately Jesus stretched forth his hand, and caught him, and said unto him, O thou of little faith, wherefore didst thou doubt?" That's a good lesson for us not to doubt. We are not doing this in our own strength, but in His. Without Him, he said that we could do nothing.

Ask the Lord what he wants you to do. After all, he gave you the talents you have to fulfill the plan he has for your life. Maybe it is a bit different from what you think. Let him guide you. Look at what opportunities you have before you. Go through the doors he opens in front of you, and don't try to open doors he firmly closes. Keep walking, but be like Enoch, who "walked with God" (Gen. 5:24). Agape

Incoming email

Re: OSLO ACCORDS
I came across the following while searching for info on the Net :

"The Oslo Accords, also known as the Declaration of Principles signed August 20, 1993, was unknown to the world other than in what bits and pieces the media came across until publically presented in Washington DC on September 13 that same year...."

Found it interesting that this happened exactly SEVEN years before the scheduled declaration date for the State of Palestine this year. Praying, watching and waiting with you. Agape

My reply

I know. It seems to be marking 7 good years and 7 bad years, as when Joseph was in Egypt. Sept. 13, 1993 + 14 = Sept. 13, 2007. The Oslo Accords were ratified 3 days later, on Tishri 1, 5754. Add 14 years and you come to Tishri 1, 5768, which just happens to be Sept. 13, 2007, the very day I think the millennial Day of the Lord begins.

Also, I think the Sign of the End of the Age was the Six-Day War of 1967, when Israel grew leaves (Sinai, West Bank, Gaza Strip and Golan Heights) and fulfilled the fig tree parable of Mt. 24:32-34.

This is interesting too. From Nisan 8 in 30 AD, when Jesus came to Bethany before Palm Sunday, to Av 10, when the temple was burned in 70 AD, was 40 years, plus another 120 days.

In our days, from Iyar 28, 5727 (June 7, 1967), when they regained the temple area to Tishri 1, 5768 (Sept. 13, 2007) is also 40 years, plus another 120 days. It all seems to be too good to be by accident. I think God is regulating all these things to bring his prophecies to pass here at the end of this age.

He is giving us signs to show that the day of his coming for us is drawing near. I'm praying, watching and waiting too. Agape

Incoming email

From: JimDandy: JimDandy@godisdead.com
Re: Rapture
Hi Marilyn, Say, what happened to the Rapture? Wasn't that supposed to be sometime last month? Didn't get left behind, did you? Curious
-JimDandy
(To the rescue!)
__________________________________________________________
--->Get you free email @godisdead.com
Made possible by Fade to Black Comedy Magazine

My reply

Nope. We are still waiting. Have you seen the Anchor Cross signs in the sails of the ship ARGO (the company of travelers) and in the Sun? This same Anchor Cross was engraved in the stone above the door of the tomb. His coming is drawing nigh. Be ready. Agape

Incoming email

Re: Storacles of Prophecy by Amazing Facts
It really means alot that you took the time out of your very busy life to reply, I love you, in the Lord. Thanks so much for your website and commitment to the Word of God!!I am so excited everyday on my lunch break at work, and then when I get home, to check for updates!! Every day is exciting as we watch the news concerning what's going on in Israel, and around the world and in the Heavens, we are so LUCKY to be alive to witness these last days!!! bye! Thanks.

My reply

Thank you. I'm just glad I could help. That Bible study is not a good one. You will learn much more by just reading the Bible for yourself. Agape

Incoming email

Re: Mary as Co-redeemer
In regard to the upcoming Marian dogma, the word "Co" is intended to mean "with" i.e., Mary was "with" the redeemer and suffered as any mother would who was seeing her son crucified. 2 Timothy 2:12 says, "If we suffer (with him) we shall also reign with him." The dogma is only meant to make public notice of what is already scriptural truth. Just as the Pentecostals like to get the word out on the Holy Spirit and Protestants enjoy publishing the scriptures, even so Catholics like to give martyrs and mothers their just due. What is the judgment seat of Christ all about anyway if it isn't recognizing and rewarding contributions of key Christians? This is just a little preview of coming attractions!

My reply

To me, Co-Redemptrix means more than what it does to you.

I Tim. 2:5 says, "For there is one God, and ONE MEDIATOR between God and men, the MAN Christ Jesus"

On page 320, in This is the Faith: Catholic Theology for Laymen, by Rev. Francis J. Ripley, he said,
"Mary, Mother of God
The 3rd General Coucil of the Church, held at Ephesus in the year 431, solemnly defined that the Blessed Virgin Mary is the Mother of God. That this is so follows from the truth already explained that there is only one Person in Jesus Christ, God the Son. Mary is the Mother of that one divine Person. THERE IS NO HUMAN PERSONALITY IN CHRIST, and she certainly could not be Mother of a mere human nature."

That flies in the face of John 1:14: "And the Word was made FLESH, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth."

It flies in the face of II Cor. 5:19: "God was IN Christ, reconciling the world unto himself."

It also flies in the face of Isa. 9:6. It says, "For unto us a child is born (inheriting his human nature from his mother), unto us a son is given (inheriting his deity from his Father): and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace."

On page 322, Ripley said, "Because of the inexpressible dignity that is hers, the Catholic Church has from the beginning given Mary the HIGHEST FORM OF WORSHIP below that reserved for God alone.... From Mary's divine Motherhood, all her other dignities flow. The first of these is her Immaculate Conception."

One error begets another, and you can be led astray so easily, one step at a time.

On page 324,5, Ripley said, "It is also Catholic teaching that Our Blessed Lady was always absolutely sinless."

That flies in the face of Rom. 3:23: "For ALL have sinned, and come short of the glory of God"

On page 327, Ripley said, "Further, it is the teaching of the whole Catholic Church today that EVERY GRACE GIVEN TO MEN COMES TO THEM THROUGH MARY...FROM GOD TO CHRIST, FROM CHRIST TO THE BLESSED VIRGIN, AND FROM THE BLESSED VIRGIN TO US....NO GRACE DESCENDS TO MEN EXCEPT THROUGH THE HANDS, THAT IS, THE INTERCESSION OF MARY."

On page 328,9, Ripley said, "'To Jesus through Mary' is a thoroughly Christian sentiment as well as a most useful criterion for the development of the love of God in the soul. The King of heaven and earth will certainly not close His ears to the requests of His Queen and Mother, and the Mother of men will certainly not fail to hearken to the PRAYERS of her children, and form them to the perfect image of her Son."

I think you are being deceived and don't know it. Agape

My reply to incoming email

***From Marilyn: You have sent me 7 emails to try to convince me that Jesus was born on Tabernacles. You said, "Its clear from the scriptures that Yshua was born on sukkot."

***I don't think it is as clear as you think it is. You can't take what a PERSON wrote as gospel truth over what SCRIPTURE says. Examine what people say to see if it agrees with Scripture. Do some arithmetic. People may have a preconceived opinion they are trying to prove and stretch things a bit here and there to make it fit.

***I think Jesus came as the former rain on Tishri 1, as stated in Hos. 6:3: " the LORD: his going forth is prepared as the morning; and he shall come unto us as the rain, as the latter and former rain unto the earth." The former rain starts Tishri 1, the latter rain Nisan 1. I believe he was born as the former rain on the first day of the Civil Year (Tishri 1) and will return as the latter rain on the first day of the Sacred Year (Nisan 1). Eze. 29:17 sets the day, " IN THE FIRST MONTH, IN THE FIRST DAY OF THE MONTH." Then v. 21 says, "IN THAT DAY will I cause the horn (king) of the house of Israel to bud forth, and I will give thee the opening of the mouth (Word, Logos) in the midst of them; and they shall know that I am the LORD."

> > Allowing two weeks for the laws of separation that G-d commanded in Leviticus (Vayikra) 12:5; 15:19,24-25 after going back to the house (Luke 1:23) and then going forward nine months (Sivan [tenth week] + 2 weeks + 9 months) puts the birth of John (Yochanan) during the festival of Passover (Pesach). This is an extremely important point

***Lev. 12:5 is talking about after the birth of a girl child. That won't buy you the 2 weeks you want.

> > In Birth of Yeshua (Jesus) during Succoth, Greg Killian said, "Doug Dolly in his book, "Messiah Our Passover is Sacrificed", wrote, "When Zekharya (Zechariah) was ministering in the temple, he received an announcement from God of a coming son. The eighth course of Abia, when Zekharya was ministering, was the week of Sivan 12 to 18. If Zekharya's promised son Yochanan (John the baptizer) were conceived soon thereafter, then Yeshua's conception, which was six months later, would be late Chiselev to early Tevet, near Chanukah (the Feast of Dedication); His birth would thence be at mid Tishri, the Feast of Succoth (Tabernacles)."

***Let's see if this holds water. The number of days from Nisan to Tishri are the same every year. Therefore, the 8 weeks plus 2 weeks for Passover and Pentecost that "Zacharias, of the course of Abia" (Lu. 1:5) served would be:
1. Nisan 1 - 7
2. Nisan 8 - 14
3. Nisan 15 - 21
4. Nisan 22 - 28
5. Nisan 29 - Iyar 5
6. Iyar 6 - 12
7. Iyar 13 - 19
8. Iyar 20 - 26
9. Iyar 27 - Sivan 4
10. Sivan 5 - 11
Therefore, Zacharias would have been at home starting Sivan 12, not Sivan 19.

***Elizabeth's 6 months could have been:
1. Sivan 12 - Tamuz 11
2. Tamuz 12 - Av 11
3. Av 12 - Elul 11
4. Elul 12 - Tishri 11
5. Tishri 12 - Cheshvan 11
6. Cheshvan 12 - Kislev 11

***Lu. 1:26,36 says, "And in the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent from God unto a city of Galilee, named Nazareth,To a virgin espoused to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David; and the virgin's name was Mary....And, behold, thy cousin Elisabeth, she hath also conceived a son in her old age: and this is the sixth month with her."

***Elizabeth's 6th month could have been from Cheshvan 12 to Kislev 11. When Mary went to see Elizabeth in this 6th month, the babe lept in Elizabeth's womb and Mary said, "he that is mighty HATH done to me great things" (Lu. 1:49). Does that add up to Kislev 25 for Jesus' conception to you? The more I examine what these people are saying, the more I find wrong with this concept. They seem determined to stretch out the time an extra 2 weeks to fit their preconceived opinions.

> > The apostle Yochanan (John) tells us that the Word (of God) became flesh and "dwelt in a succah" (tabernacled) among us.[13]
[13] Apostolic Writings: Yochanan / John 1:14 (The author views Succoth as figurative of Messiah's coming to dwell among His people; this reference is not submitted as proof of a dogmatic date.)

***In spite of his note that "this reference is not submitted as proof of a dogmatic date," people keep telling me that Jesus tabernacled among us, so he was born on Tabernacles. I don't think it means that. He dwelt among us for 33.5 years, not one day. Jn. 1:14,15 says, " And the Word was made flesh, and DWELT among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. John bare witness of him, and cried, saying, This was he of whom I spake, He that cometh after me is preferred before me: for he was before me." The word translated DWELT is Strong's 4637: skenoo, to tent or encamp, i.e. (fig.) to occupy (as a mansion) or (spec.) to reside (as God did in the Tabernacle of old, a symbol of protection and communion):--dwell. Agape

   Pro and Con 551   Or Return   Home


Contact me for more information at: mjagee@pe.net


Send me e-mail now


8641 Sugar Gum Rd, Riverside, CA 92508, USA; (909) 653-4110


© 1996-2000, Marilyn J. Agee
Updated 7-9-00